Affirm
U.S. Commitment to Banning Land Mines
Baltimore Sun, Tuesday, March 4, 2002
By James Cobey and Richard Schultz
Before September 11, there was already
a war being waged on a type of indiscriminate terror: antipersonnel
land mines.
Often called "weapons of mass destruction
in slow motion," landmines indiscriminately maim and kill nearly
20,000 people each year in more than 80 nations.
In countries where surgeons, pain
medication, blood transfusions and prosthetic limbs are almost nonexistent,
people are losing their lives and limbs to mines every 30 minutes.
Most of the victims are civilians, and about one-third of them are
children.
Farming, travel and economic development
are made nearly impossible by the terrifying presence, or perceived
presence, of mines left over from conflicts days, months or decades
old.
Nearly three-quarters of the world's
countries have joined the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, which outlaws the
manufacture, transfer, stockpiling and use of this outdated weapon.
With the current war on terrorism
and its condemnation of countries that produce weapons of terror,
it makes more ideological sense than ever before for the United
States to join the global mine ban. It makes diplomatic and life-saving
sense as well.
All of NATO, except for the United
States and Turkey, has banned the weapon.
Without political leverage on this
issue, the United States has been unable to criticize India, which
recently began laying mines along the border with Pakistan, or Russia,
which continues to lay mines that wound and kill civilians in Chechnya.
Our government's reluctance to participate
in this successful accord has also given political cover to the
Northern Alliance, which has allegedly used the weapon in Afghanistan
in recent months.
The result over decades will be
countless more civilian land-mine injuries and deaths in a place
that already had the distinction of being the worst mine-affected
country in the world, with an estimated 5 million to 10 million
mines in the ground.
Sadly, it comes as no surprise that
American soldiers have recently had limbs blown off by land mines
in Afghanistan.
President Bill Clinton's land-mine
policy was for the United States to move toward compliance with
the Mine Ban Treaty by 2006 if certain military conditions could
be met, including those pertaining to the protection of South Korea.
However, many retired military leaders
have spoken out against the weapon. In May, eight retired U.S. admirals
and generals, including a former commander of U.S. troops in Korea,
wrote to President Bush that antipersonnel land mines "are outmoded
weapons that have, time and again, proved to be a liability to our
own troops.
"We believe that the military, diplomatic,
and humanitarian advantages of speedy U.S. accession [to the treaty]
far outweigh the minimal military utility of these weapons."
In November, more than 500 U.S.
veterans from all 50 states sent a similar letter to the president,
reminding him that mines have caused more than 100,000 U.S. Army
casualties since 1942, including one- third of all casualties in
Vietnam and in the Persian Gulf war.
Human Rights Watch recently determined
that nearly half of the land mines that are designated to protect
South Korea from an unlikely North Korean invasion are actually
stockpiled in the United States, not in Korea.
This calls into question the notion
of the true usefulness of mines to the United States or other modern
armies.
The Bush administration is reviewing
U.S. land-mine policy. Unfortunately, as part of this review, the
Defense Department recently asked the president to abandon all efforts
to ban land mines by 2006 or ever and to eliminate the search for
alternatives to mines.
As a result, in late December, 124
members of Congress, Democrats and Republicans, sent a letter to
Mr. Bush asking him to not heed these recommendations but to eliminate
land mines from the U.S. arsenal as soon as possible.
Now is a perfect time for the administration
to affirm the U.S. commitment to ban land mines.
James Cobey, a member of Physicians
for Human Rights, is an orthopedic surgeon practicing in Washington
and a senior associate at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of
Public Health. Richard Schultz, who lives in Crofton, lost both
legs to a land- mine explosion while serving in Vietnam. He is a
retired Army sergeant and the former legislative director of a major
veterans service organization.
Copyright © 2002, The Baltimore
Sun
|